|
The economy of St. Maarten can be considered
to have performed relatively weak with mixed indicators
in the first quarter of 2003, compared to the corresponding
period of 2002 .The weak performance of the 2002 has continued
to persist in the 1st Quarter of 2003, even when we compare
the information to the same period of 2001. Normally, when
the economy is affected by external factors such as hurricanes
and/or unnatural disasters such as 9-11, the following year
the economic indicators should indicate relatively high
increases (which are considered inflated increases). However,
when we observe only moderate relative increases and especially
negative growth in the various economic indicators then
we know that the economy has not regained its full growth.
This pattern was also observed in our
most comprehensive indicator namely, the Turnover tax (ToT).
The ToT showed an accumulated increase in the 1st Quarter
of 2003, compared to the same period in 2002. Even when
we compared the 1st Quarter of 2003 with the corresponding
period of 2001, we see a moderate increase in ToT. When
we factor out recent inflation figure patterns for the last
three years (i.e. 1999-2001), then we can only assume that
the economy has increased moderately. The exact indication
is not known, as the inflation rate for the first quarter
of 2003 was not available at the time of compilation of
this report. Nevertheless, we can say that the performance
of the economy was relatively moderate.
A possible explanation for the moderate
performance could be the continued weak performance of the
US economy, which continues to be relatively weak, and consumer
confidence is still relatively low and it has not rebounded
fully. Despite, the numerous interest rate cuts by the Federal
Reserve, the economy has not fully recovered from its stagnant
state. As we are aware, the economy of St. Maarten is primarily
dependent upon tourism especially from the US market. Consequently,
we observed a moderate performance of the economy.
Considering that the economy mainly depends
on tourism, it is critical to ascertain how the various
sectors of the tourism industry performed. When we look
at stay-over tourism, we witnessed a moderate increase in
the 1st quarter of 2003, compared to the same period of
2002. Naturally, the latter quarter suffered from the delayed
impact of 9-11 that spilled over into the first half of
2002, which resulted in the categorization of stay-over
tourism performing poorly despite the increase in 2003 Quarter
1. This finding is strengthened by the fact that quarter
1 of 2003, observed a decrease when compared to a “neutral”
corresponding period such as 2001 Quarter 1. Obviously,
St. Maarten does not exist in a vacuum and most tourism
destinations are all experiencing the same relative pattern/performance.
An additional source of concern was indicated
in the cruise tourism industry. Over the last five years
cruise industry has been one of the main driving forces
of this tourism based economy, where the yearly increases
have always been in the high double digit numbers. However,
the performance of cruise tourism has been relatively marginal
compared to the current historical data (i.e. the last five
years). Considering the previously-mentioned discussion
on the inflated increases, cruise tourism experienced a
moderate increase in the 1st quarter of 2003 compared to
the 1st quarter of 2002 (despite the delayed effects of
9-11 in quarter 1 of 2002). In addition, when we compare
2003 1st quarter to the same period of 2001, we observed
even a smaller increase. This gives reason for concern as
it has been argued that this industry (i.e. cruise tourism)
has been keeping our economy (especially the Front Street
businesses) afloat. With the weak performance of this sector,
this could eventually lead to more businesses closing their
doors as well as an increase in unemployment.
Strengthening the previous analysis,
government revenue dropped in the 1st quarter of 2003, compared
the same period in 2002. This is critical, as we should
at least have experienced “artificial” increases
because of the delayed effects in 2002 quarter 1. In addition,
when we consider that a significant reason for the revenue
decline was a direct result of wage tax decreasing, then
we can see that the economy is certainly slipping. This
is even strengthened by the fact when we compare the first
quarter of 2003 with the same period of 2001, where there
was an even greater decrease in government revenue.
Consistent with this pattern was the
developments of Federal Government revenue such as AOV/AWW,
which we utilized as a means to measure and monitor developments
in the labor market. AOV/AWW has shown a significant decrease
in the first quarter of 2003 compared to both corresponding
periods of 2002 and 2001. Similarly, the pattern was exactly
the same with AVBZ, as it was with AOV/AWW. The two above-mentioned
indicators (AOV/AWW & AVBZ) are consistent with developments
in the wage tax, indicating that unemployment may be increasing.
The performance of the economy by monitoring developments
of the utility company, G.E.B.E., is also critical to our
analysis. To this end, we observe marginal increases in
water production in the 1st quarter of 2003, compared to
both corresponding periods of 2002 and 2001. However, electricity
production during the same period demonstrated higher increases.
Despite the above-mentioned, confidence
in the economy of St. Maarten can still be considered relatively
good, as the number of persons wishing to establish a business
in St. Maarten has increased in the first quarter of 2003,
compared to the same period of 2002 and 2001. This could
partially be explained that individuals have confidence
in the economy, they have not studied the economy sufficiently,
they could be requesting business licenses for different
motives other than to operate a business immediately, and/or
the numerous projects of government to increase the tax
base, which have been specifically trying to target businesses
that have been operating without a license.
To verify the above-mentioned assumptions,
we see that there are a number of existing businesses, which
have requested a branch license, which could possibly show
confidence in the economy. This perspective is somewhat
dampened by the fact that the number of cancellations have
also increased in 2003 1st quarter, relative to the corresponding
period of 2002 and 2001.
Developments in the gasoline industry have also been consistent
with our economic indicators, which is a general slowing
of the industry in the 1st quarter of 2003, compared to
2002. In particular, when we compare the 1st quarter 2003
with 2001, to factor out the delayed effects of Sept. 11,
we observe that the gasoline industry has also experienced
a slow down in 2003. However, within these developments
there was some shifting of activity from one wholesaler
to the next, thereby creating the impression (at least for
one wholesaler) that economic activity is booming. In actuality,
one was gaining volume and market share, while the other
was loosing, however aggregately the industry have begun
to slow down.
In conclusion, the economy continues
to perform relatively weak with slight signs of recovery.
Unfortunately, the weak performances have outweighed the
signs of recovery and have given cause for concern. Despite
the above-mentioned, it is imperative that we examine these
results within its proper context and the fact that we are
primarily a tourism-based economy that is heavily dependent
upon the US tourist market. Considering that the US economy
continues to perform relatively weak, it is a foregone conclusion
that our economy will continue to experience some weakness.
This will and it has spilled over into the local domestic
economy where unemployment has begun to filtrate into the
economy and in particular contributed to the worsening of
the government coffers.
For this reason and the strengthening
of the Euro, this is the opportune time to tap into the
European market for additional tourists. Considering the
fact that St. Maarten has lost many of the Latin American
market mainly as a result of the economic problems in those
countries, alternative destinations are imperative to penetrate
to make-up for the loss of tourist arrivals and expenditures.
In addition, targeting the European market is consistent
with the diversification efforts of government outlined
in the CEDP (i.e. diversification of both tourism and the
economy in general).
In the final analysis, the war
with Iraq and the consistent possible terrorist threats
to the US economy, cautiously optimistic continues to be
the order of the day. It is hoped and expected that the
latter part of the year will observe a complete rebound.
Obviously, this depends significantly on St. Maarten not
experiencing a major hurricane this season and other external
factors such as no additional terrorist attacks and/or threats.
|